MARGARET HICKS - BMO INSURANCE STORY

 

 

BMO/Margaret Hicks Update:

Viewpoint: Ron Hicks (July 9th, 2010)
$3 Million lawsuit for bad faith employment and insurance practices.
Margaret Hicks forced to pursue this case in the criminal courts to get justice.
Blaney McMurtry (Bank of Montreal lawyers) actions regarding the Civil Procedures of this case have forced Margaret Hicks to seek justice in the criminal courts first.  They clearly lack: integrity, transparency and accountability in securing justice in this case.

 It is the opinion of this writer that in their motion record to demand Margaret Hicks answers to questions that had nothing to do with this case are for any purpose but the truth,  regarding Margaret's statement-of-claim.  It is our opinion, they have used perjury, conspiracy to commit fraud and obstruction of justice to convince the courts.  All our claims covered by the criminal code of Canada.

In simple terms,  the claims in the motion are that Margaret Hicks filed a statement of claim for $3,000.000.00 because her skin condition caused her to itch.  And Margaret Hicks' claims that it effected the way she performed her duties.  Which is truly false.

Margaret Hicks filed her statement of claim because BMO Insurance (AIG Life of Canada) set her up to be fired because she refused to work overtime without being paid.  And their actions caused her current medical condition - major depression.  They also made her wait 8 months to get her short-term and long term disability benefits.

Blaney McMurtry knew that Margaret Hicks is still on disability benefits for major depression that were caused by their clients actions.  You do not get long term disability benefits if you have a skin condition that causes you to itch.

We will update this sections regularly to keep you informed about the police response to our request for a criminal investigation into this matter.

Viewpoint: Ron Hicks update (October 23rd, 2009)

It took till September 10th, 2009 for AIG Life of Canada (BMO) to respond to our  40 questions that required answers by affidavit form.  Margaret provided their lawyers (voluntarily) with a written observation to their answers. On October 22nd, 2009 Margaret attended an oral examination for discovery in Toronto at AIG Life of Canada's (BMO) requests.   

Both Margaret and myself are very confident that the "real evidence" and the chronology of events are solidly in Margaret's favour.   We can now  start to prepare for the court proceedings.  Margaret may have to attend a mediation process but that, does not interest her at this point.  We both are prepared and have confidence in our Justice system.  

Viewpoint: Ron Hicks (July 8th, 2009)

In my opinion the 'real evidence' regarding the "Margaret Hicks v AIG Insurance Company of Canada" will prove it to be the worst case of employee abuse in the history of Canadian law.  Margaret (my wife) 7 years after the facts, is still under care of a physciatrist and attends the hospital regularly for her lichen planus condition.

In addition AIG's lawyers used fraudulent methods which forced Scoreboard Canada Inc. a very profitable company into its demise. By making false and defamatory claims to my suppliers and advertisers that I had false information on my websites regarding Hicks/AIG.

Failing to follow through when they sued me for $500,000.00 after they were  provided with the real evidence regarding the Margaret Hicks/AIG story is proof in itself how evil this company can be.  They not only destroyed my wife, they also destroyed our family.

AIG's lawyers tried the same tactics again in 2008 and early 2009 to get the Margaret Hicks story and AIG corruption watch section down from my websites. 

In April 2009, I suffered a mild stroke while driving and had an accident. I am under care of a neurologist for possible brain damage.  There is a lot of stress for both Margaret and myself as I am obsessed with getting justice for both of us.  I will be taking the necessary legal action as soon as I get the doctors approval.  Lawyers are extremely expensive and after 7 years I am beginning to realize justice in Canada can only be obtained at a huge cost.  Not only financially but mentally as well.

On the 8th of July 2009 Margaret Hicks informed AIG's lawyers Blaney McMurtry  she will be proceeding by written questions prescribed by 35B of Rules of Civil procedure.  There are 40 questions that require answers by affidavit form.  This is in response to Margaret Hicks' statement of claim for $3,000.000. in damages and their defense statement.

Click character for audio intro.

Recent Update Click Here

 

 
hit counter for tumblr